Skip to main content
Fig. 11 | Journal of Materials Science: Materials Theory

Fig. 11

From: Role of interfaces on the mechanical response of accumulative roll bonded nanometallic laminates investigated via dislocation dynamics simulations

Fig. 11

Comparing mechanical behavior under shear YZ compression loading of 200 nm thick Fe/Cu NMLs with \(\{1\ 1\ 2\}/\{1\ 1\ 2\}\) and \(\{1\ 1\ 0\}/\{1\ 1\ 1\}\) interfaces. a and b plots the total bulk (magenta), junction (tan), Fe bulk (red), Cu bulk (blue), and the interface (gray) dislocation density evolution during the shear compression loading for the \(\{1\ 1\ 2\}/\{1\ 1\ 2\}\) (solid curves), and \(\{1\ 1\ 0\}/\{1\ 1\ 1\}\) (dashed curves) interfaces, respectively. As before, (c) plots the corresponding shear stress-strain response for \(\{1\ 1\ 2\}/\{1\ 1\ 2\}\) (purple solid curves), and \(\{1\ 1\ 0\}/\{1\ 1\ 1\}\) (gray dashed curves) under the ND compression loading. Similarly, transmission propensity as a function total transmission events is also compared for the two interfaces, (d), with the \(\{1\ 1\ 2\}/\{1\ 1\ 2\}\) interface (green) showing a higher propensity as compared to the \(\{1\ 1\ 0\}/\{1\ 1\ 1\}\) (blue) interface

Back to article page