Fig. 10From: Role of interfaces on the mechanical response of accumulative roll bonded nanometallic laminates investigated via dislocation dynamics simulationsComparing mechanical behavior under interface ND compression loading of 200 nm thick Fe/Cu NMLs with \(\{1\ 1\ 2\}/\{1\ 1\ 2\}\) and \(\{1\ 1\ 0\}/\{1\ 1\ 1\}\) interfaces. a and b plots the total bulk (magenta), junction (tan), Fe bulk (red), Cu bulk (blue), and the interface (gray) dislocation density evolution during the ND compression loading for the \(\{1\ 1\ 2\}/\{1\ 1\ 2\}\) (solid curves), and \(\{1\ 1\ 0\}/\{1\ 1\ 1\}\) (dashed curves) interfaces, respectively. As before, (c) plots the corresponding directional stress-strain response for \(\{1\ 1\ 2\}/\{1\ 1\ 2\}\) (purple solid curves), and \(\{1\ 1\ 0\}/\{1\ 1\ 1\}\) (gray dashed curves) under the ND compression loading. Similarly, transmission propensity as a function total transmission events is also compared for the two interfaces, (d), with the \(\{1\ 1\ 2\}/\{1\ 1\ 2\}\) interface (green) showing a higher propensity as compared to the \(\{1\ 1\ 0\}/\{1\ 1\ 1\}\) (blue) interfaceBack to article page